https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185177 Mandatory safeguards in a revenue sale were treated as conditions going to the root of validity. Failure to affix the sale notice on a conspicuous part of the land under Section 36 was held to be a vitiating illegality, not a mere irregularity under Section 38, because the requirement protects identification of the property, bidder awareness and fair price. Selling the entire property, instead of only the portion necessary to realise the dues, breached the proviso to Section 44 and was likewise held illegal. The revenue auction sale was therefore set aside. en-us Mon, 17 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Aug 2016 18:02:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185177 Mandatory safeguards in a revenue sale were treated as conditions going to the root of validity. Failure to affix the sale notice on a conspicuous part of the land under Section 36 was held to be a vitiating illegality, not a mere irregularity under Section 38, because the requirement protects identification of the property, bidder awareness and fair price. Selling the entire property, instead of only the portion necessary to realise the dues, breached the proviso to Section 44 and was likewise held illegal. The revenue auction sale was therefore set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185177