<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 585 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185173</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the need for objective consideration of explanations provided by the taxpayer and the importance of reconciling discrepancies in valuation reports and disclosed jewellery. The judgment highlighted the significance of providing due consideration to disclosures made by family members and the application of relevant schemes in determining the legitimacy of undisclosed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 17:26:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 585 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185173</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the need for objective consideration of explanations provided by the taxpayer and the importance of reconciling discrepancies in valuation reports and disclosed jewellery. The judgment highlighted the significance of providing due consideration to disclosures made by family members and the application of relevant schemes in determining the legitimacy of undisclosed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>