https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185170 For limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963, a decree for specific performance becomes enforceable when it is executable according to its own terms, and time runs from the stipulated date unless execution is postponed by a true contingency or legal bar. Here, the decree required demarcation and deposit by 23.9.1966 and allowed the court to execute the sale deed on default, so no external contingency prevented enforcement. Limitation therefore began on 23.9.1966, not on the later alleged date of measurement and demarcation. On that basis, the execution petition was time-barred and the dismissal of the petition was upheld. en-us Tue, 30 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Aug 2016 17:20:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185170 For limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963, a decree for specific performance becomes enforceable when it is executable according to its own terms, and time runs from the stipulated date unless execution is postponed by a true contingency or legal bar. Here, the decree required demarcation and deposit by 23.9.1966 and allowed the court to execute the sale deed on default, so no external contingency prevented enforcement. Limitation therefore began on 23.9.1966, not on the later alleged date of measurement and demarcation. On that basis, the execution petition was time-barred and the dismissal of the petition was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185170