<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 62 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330678</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the arm&#039;s length price adjustment for intra group services would decrease the income, contravening Section 92(3) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the transfer pricing provisions could not be applied to intra group services, providing relief to the assessee by disallowing the adjustment and preventing erosion of the tax base.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 62 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330678</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the arm&#039;s length price adjustment for intra group services would decrease the income, contravening Section 92(3) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the transfer pricing provisions could not be applied to intra group services, providing relief to the assessee by disallowing the adjustment and preventing erosion of the tax base.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>