<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 57 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330673</link>
    <description>A journal entry recorded pursuant to a scheme of arrangement was treated as an accounting adjustment and not an actual payment to the overseas associate enterprise. On that basis, tax deduction at source under section 195 was not attracted, and the foundation for invoking section 40(a)(ia) was absent. The resulting disallowance was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 57 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330673</link>
      <description>A journal entry recorded pursuant to a scheme of arrangement was treated as an accounting adjustment and not an actual payment to the overseas associate enterprise. On that basis, tax deduction at source under section 195 was not attracted, and the foundation for invoking section 40(a)(ia) was absent. The resulting disallowance was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>