<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 56 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330672</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and deleting the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to delete the addition made under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. The judgments of the Bombay High Court and Delhi High Court were instrumental in these outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:44:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 56 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330672</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and deleting the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to delete the addition made under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. The judgments of the Bombay High Court and Delhi High Court were instrumental in these outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>