<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 48 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330664</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal by the assessee, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues. The disallowance of vehicle expenses, the application of Section 40(a)(ia), and the disallowance under Section 40A(3) were all found to be justified based on the facts and legal precedents presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:44:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 48 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330664</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal by the assessee, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues. The disallowance of vehicle expenses, the application of Section 40(a)(ia), and the disallowance under Section 40A(3) were all found to be justified based on the facts and legal precedents presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>