<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 45 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330661</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the jurisdictional issue and the enhancement of assessment for fresh adjudication by the CIT (Appeals). Emphasizing the necessity of recording satisfaction before initiating proceedings under Section 153C, the Tribunal required detailed factual findings from the CIT (Appeals) on this matter. Other issues raised by the assessee were kept open for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:44:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 45 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330661</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the jurisdictional issue and the enhancement of assessment for fresh adjudication by the CIT (Appeals). Emphasizing the necessity of recording satisfaction before initiating proceedings under Section 153C, the Tribunal required detailed factual findings from the CIT (Appeals) on this matter. Other issues raised by the assessee were kept open for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>