<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 246 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4362</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the reference application concerning the interpretation of Notification No. 14/97-C.E. (N.T.) on Modvat for RFO. The petitioner&#039;s challenge against the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order was based on the substance being LSHS, not RFO. However, the court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, citing past cases where the substance purchased was considered RFO. The court emphasized maintaining consistency to avoid market disparities and discrimination, leading to the dismissal of the application as the question raised was deemed unnecessary for a decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 246 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4362</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the reference application concerning the interpretation of Notification No. 14/97-C.E. (N.T.) on Modvat for RFO. The petitioner&#039;s challenge against the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order was based on the substance being LSHS, not RFO. However, the court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, citing past cases where the substance purchased was considered RFO. The court emphasized maintaining consistency to avoid market disparities and discrimination, leading to the dismissal of the application as the question raised was deemed unnecessary for a decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>