https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330654 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the Appellant in the case concerning the demand for interest on delayed payment of differential duty. The Tribunal held that the demand for interest issued after a significant delay was barred by limitation, citing relevant legal precedents. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the Appellant. en-us Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330654 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the Appellant in the case concerning the demand for interest on delayed payment of differential duty. The Tribunal held that the demand for interest issued after a significant delay was barred by limitation, citing relevant legal precedents. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the Appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330654