<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 37 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330653</link>
    <description>On clearance of long-used capital goods, only the Cenvat credit attributable to the depreciated value was recoverable; full reversal of the credit originally availed was not required. Applying the Larger Bench view, the Madras High Court ruling in Rogini Mills, and the relevant C.B.E. &amp; C. circular, the liability was limited to the amount computed on depreciated value rather than the entire original credit. As the assessee had already reversed more than that amount, the demand could not be sustained, and the penalty and interest were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 37 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330653</link>
      <description>On clearance of long-used capital goods, only the Cenvat credit attributable to the depreciated value was recoverable; full reversal of the credit originally availed was not required. Applying the Larger Bench view, the Madras High Court ruling in Rogini Mills, and the relevant C.B.E. &amp; C. circular, the liability was limited to the amount computed on depreciated value rather than the entire original credit. As the assessee had already reversed more than that amount, the demand could not be sustained, and the penalty and interest were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>