<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 591 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185154</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in service tax penalty appeals where the entire service tax liability had already been paid before the order-in-original and the adjudicating authority had recorded no mala fide intent to evade payment. Those facts were treated as establishing a strong prima facie case for interim protection, and the same reasoning was applied in the companion matter. Recovery of the disputed amounts was stayed pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 12:20:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 591 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185154</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in service tax penalty appeals where the entire service tax liability had already been paid before the order-in-original and the adjudicating authority had recorded no mala fide intent to evade payment. Those facts were treated as establishing a strong prima facie case for interim protection, and the same reasoning was applied in the companion matter. Recovery of the disputed amounts was stayed pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>