<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 666 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), KANPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185152</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that procuring orders on a commission basis did not constitute services as a C&amp;amp;F agent. The demand for Service Tax, interest, and penalties was deemed unsustainable, leading to the setting aside of the Order-in-Original and allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 12:10:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 666 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), KANPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185152</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that procuring orders on a commission basis did not constitute services as a C&amp;amp;F agent. The demand for Service Tax, interest, and penalties was deemed unsustainable, leading to the setting aside of the Order-in-Original and allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>