https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185151 A suit by an unregistered partnership firm is barred under Section 69(2) of the Partnership Act only to the extent it seeks enforcement of contractual rights. Where the plaint, read as a whole, also discloses an independent statutory basis for possession after expiry of the lease, the claim is maintainable on that footing. The Court treated the tenant's continued occupation after determination of the lease as occupation at sufferance and recognised the landlord's statutory right to recover possession under the Transfer of Property Act. The question whether later registration could revive the suit was left undecided because the decree was sustainable on the statutory cause of action. en-us Tue, 08 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Aug 2016 12:06:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185151 A suit by an unregistered partnership firm is barred under Section 69(2) of the Partnership Act only to the extent it seeks enforcement of contractual rights. Where the plaint, read as a whole, also discloses an independent statutory basis for possession after expiry of the lease, the claim is maintainable on that footing. The Court treated the tenant's continued occupation after determination of the lease as occupation at sufferance and recognised the landlord's statutory right to recover possession under the Transfer of Property Act. The question whether later registration could revive the suit was left undecided because the decree was sustainable on the statutory cause of action. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185151