https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185148 In a second appeal, the High Court's jurisdiction is confined to substantial questions of law under Section 100 CPC, while the first appellate court remains the final court of facts under Section 96 CPC. Findings of fact may be challenged for perversity or absence of evidence, but only if that specific challenge is framed as a substantial question of law. Because no such question was framed on the identity finding that Lakshmi and Ramayee were the same person, the High Court reappreciated evidence beyond its permitted scope and its interference could not be sustained. en-us Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Aug 2016 11:33:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185148 In a second appeal, the High Court's jurisdiction is confined to substantial questions of law under Section 100 CPC, while the first appellate court remains the final court of facts under Section 96 CPC. Findings of fact may be challenged for perversity or absence of evidence, but only if that specific challenge is framed as a substantial question of law. Because no such question was framed on the identity finding that Lakshmi and Ramayee were the same person, the High Court reappreciated evidence beyond its permitted scope and its interference could not be sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185148