https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185145 A co-operative land development bank controlled by statutory service regulations and State-appointed management was treated as amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 because pervasive State control and public statutory duties brought it within constitutional review. The disciplinary action was upheld because the employees received charge-sheets, access to relied-upon material, an opportunity to inspect documents, submit explanations, and participate in the inquiry, and the governing service regulations and natural justice requirements were followed. The absence of a separate detailed dismissal order did not, by itself, vitiate the proceedings where the prescribed procedure had been complied with. en-us Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:59:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185145 A co-operative land development bank controlled by statutory service regulations and State-appointed management was treated as amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 because pervasive State control and public statutory duties brought it within constitutional review. The disciplinary action was upheld because the employees received charge-sheets, access to relied-upon material, an opportunity to inspect documents, submit explanations, and participate in the inquiry, and the governing service regulations and natural justice requirements were followed. The absence of a separate detailed dismissal order did not, by itself, vitiate the proceedings where the prescribed procedure had been complied with. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185145