<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 660 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185129</link>
    <description>Premises let as an office must be used in accordance with that commercial purpose; using them instead as a godown for storage of records can constitute a change of user under the Goa, Daman &amp; Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent &amp; Eviction) Control Act, 1968. The common parlance meaning of the lease description controls, so an office is distinct from a warehouse or storage place. On the facts, the concurrent finding was that the premises had ceased to function as an office and were being used as a godown. A later plea that some banking activity had resumed did not cure the change of user because the required regulatory permission for banking at the premises was not shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 16:39:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 660 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185129</link>
      <description>Premises let as an office must be used in accordance with that commercial purpose; using them instead as a godown for storage of records can constitute a change of user under the Goa, Daman &amp; Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent &amp; Eviction) Control Act, 1968. The common parlance meaning of the lease description controls, so an office is distinct from a warehouse or storage place. On the facts, the concurrent finding was that the premises had ceased to function as an office and were being used as a godown. A later plea that some banking activity had resumed did not cure the change of user because the required regulatory permission for banking at the premises was not shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>