https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330629 The Tribunal ruled that CENVAT credit on capital goods/inputs is not admissible, and the extended recovery period cannot be invoked. It deemed the credit on input services and taken on debit notes as admissible. However, the demand for credit taken twice was found inadmissible and recoverable. The case was remitted for further adjudication to determine the inadmissible credit and reassess the penalty, allowing the appellant an opportunity to be heard. en-us Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Aug 2016 16:21:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330629 The Tribunal ruled that CENVAT credit on capital goods/inputs is not admissible, and the extended recovery period cannot be invoked. It deemed the credit on input services and taken on debit notes as admissible. However, the demand for credit taken twice was found inadmissible and recoverable. The case was remitted for further adjudication to determine the inadmissible credit and reassess the penalty, allowing the appellant an opportunity to be heard. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330629