<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 9 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330625</link>
    <description>MILMA SIP was classified by reference to its composition and the condition in which it was cleared from the factory. As the product contained about 75% water, along with cane sugar, sweetening agents and colours, and only about 25% milk constituents, it was treated as a distinct prepared product rather than a chapter 4 dairy product. Because it was marketed in frozen solid form, it was held to fall under Heading 21.05 as edible ice, not under Heading 04.04 as a milk-based product.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 9 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330625</link>
      <description>MILMA SIP was classified by reference to its composition and the condition in which it was cleared from the factory. As the product contained about 75% water, along with cane sugar, sweetening agents and colours, and only about 25% milk constituents, it was treated as a distinct prepared product rather than a chapter 4 dairy product. Because it was marketed in frozen solid form, it was held to fall under Heading 21.05 as edible ice, not under Heading 04.04 as a milk-based product.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>