<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 8 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by ITC Ltd., holding that ILTD, Guntur, is part of ITC Ltd. and eligible to distribute CENVAT credit to the company. The Tribunal found that ILTD is not a separate entity but a division of ITC Ltd., thus the credit distributed by ILTD is admissible. The order denying CENVAT credit of Rs. 3,25,80,308/- was set aside, emphasizing that ILTD&#039;s operations do not fall under Rule 7(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 8 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by ITC Ltd., holding that ILTD, Guntur, is part of ITC Ltd. and eligible to distribute CENVAT credit to the company. The Tribunal found that ILTD is not a separate entity but a division of ITC Ltd., thus the credit distributed by ILTD is admissible. The order denying CENVAT credit of Rs. 3,25,80,308/- was set aside, emphasizing that ILTD&#039;s operations do not fall under Rule 7(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>