<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 5 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330621</link>
    <description>Departmental appeals under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 are maintainable only if the Committee of Commissioners issues the statutory authorisation in the prescribed manner. A note-sheet signed internally by both Commissioners cannot replace the formal authorisation, and a document signed by only one Commissioner is insufficient. The stated legal position treats compliance with Section 35B(2) as mandatory, so an appeal filed without proper authorisation is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 16:16:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 5 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330621</link>
      <description>Departmental appeals under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 are maintainable only if the Committee of Commissioners issues the statutory authorisation in the prescribed manner. A note-sheet signed internally by both Commissioners cannot replace the formal authorisation, and a document signed by only one Commissioner is insufficient. The stated legal position treats compliance with Section 35B(2) as mandatory, so an appeal filed without proper authorisation is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>