https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185122 The revenue's appeal was found to raise no question warranting consideration because the issues were already covered by binding decisions against the revenue. Questions 2, 3 and 4 were treated as settled by prior precedent, and Question 1 also did not merit interference since the Tribunal had followed an earlier Tribunal ruling and no basis was shown to dislodge that view. The appeal therefore did not survive for consideration and was dismissed. en-us Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Aug 2016 14:57:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185122 The revenue's appeal was found to raise no question warranting consideration because the issues were already covered by binding decisions against the revenue. Questions 2, 3 and 4 were treated as settled by prior precedent, and Question 1 also did not merit interference since the Tribunal had followed an earlier Tribunal ruling and no basis was shown to dislodge that view. The appeal therefore did not survive for consideration and was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185122