<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 780 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185118</link>
    <description>A review petition was rejected because the applicants failed to explain an inordinate delay of 255 days, and the Court found no satisfactory ground to condone it. The Court also noted that, even apart from delay, the petitions had no merit. The review petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 14:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 780 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185118</link>
      <description>A review petition was rejected because the applicants failed to explain an inordinate delay of 255 days, and the Court found no satisfactory ground to condone it. The Court also noted that, even apart from delay, the petitions had no merit. The review petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>