https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330607 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA ruled in favor of the appellant on all issues raised in the appeal concerning the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on input services, non-registration of the head office as an Input Service Distributor, and the imposition of a penalty on CENVAT Credit. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) exceeded the scope of the appeal by addressing the admissibility of credit on merits, ultimately allowing the appeal and setting aside the Order-in-Appeal. en-us Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jul 2016 18:51:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330607 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA ruled in favor of the appellant on all issues raised in the appeal concerning the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on input services, non-registration of the head office as an Input Service Distributor, and the imposition of a penalty on CENVAT Credit. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) exceeded the scope of the appeal by addressing the admissibility of credit on merits, ultimately allowing the appeal and setting aside the Order-in-Appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330607