https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330605 The case involved a dispute regarding the calculation method for a 10% payment under Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellants contended that the 10% payment should be considered "other taxes" and excluded from the price of exempted goods. However, there was a difference of opinion among the members, with Member (Technical) supporting the exclusion based on previous decisions, while Member (Judicial) opposed it. The matter was suggested to be referred to a Larger Bench for a consistent interpretation. The judgment was pronounced on 29/06/2016. en-us Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jul 2016 18:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330605 The case involved a dispute regarding the calculation method for a 10% payment under Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellants contended that the 10% payment should be considered "other taxes" and excluded from the price of exempted goods. However, there was a difference of opinion among the members, with Member (Technical) supporting the exclusion based on previous decisions, while Member (Judicial) opposed it. The matter was suggested to be referred to a Larger Bench for a consistent interpretation. The judgment was pronounced on 29/06/2016. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330605