<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1201 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330603</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that their clearances were valid under Notification No.43/2001-CE(NT) due to uncancelled Annexure 1 certificates. The appellant was not liable for duty payment as long as the certificates remained valid, emphasizing the importance of canceling Annexure 1 before demanding duty. The Tribunal emphasized that without proper cancellation by the jurisdictional authority, demanding duty from the appellant was legally unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appeal with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1201 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330603</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that their clearances were valid under Notification No.43/2001-CE(NT) due to uncancelled Annexure 1 certificates. The appellant was not liable for duty payment as long as the certificates remained valid, emphasizing the importance of canceling Annexure 1 before demanding duty. The Tribunal emphasized that without proper cancellation by the jurisdictional authority, demanding duty from the appellant was legally unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appeal with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>