<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 70 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4345</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata, partially allowed the appeal in a case involving violations of the CENVAT Credit Rules by the appellants. The Tribunal found that the appellants had overdrawn from their CENVAT Account, leading to insufficient balance to pay duty on excisable goods. Despite subsequent repayment, the lower appellate authority imposed a penalty and directed the appellants to pay the duty again from the PLA Account. The Tribunal deemed this unnecessary and instead ordered payment of interest on the unpaid amount. The penalty of Rs. 5.00 lakhs was upheld as proportionate to the offense committed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 70 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4345</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata, partially allowed the appeal in a case involving violations of the CENVAT Credit Rules by the appellants. The Tribunal found that the appellants had overdrawn from their CENVAT Account, leading to insufficient balance to pay duty on excisable goods. Despite subsequent repayment, the lower appellate authority imposed a penalty and directed the appellants to pay the duty again from the PLA Account. The Tribunal deemed this unnecessary and instead ordered payment of interest on the unpaid amount. The penalty of Rs. 5.00 lakhs was upheld as proportionate to the offense committed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>