<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (2) TMI 330 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185088</link>
    <description>An undefined expression in the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code was construed by reference to the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904: &quot;City of Bombay&quot; was limited to the area within the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court before the 1945 extension, and was distinct from &quot;Greater Bombay.&quot; On that construction, village Andheri did not fall within the &quot;City of Bombay,&quot; so the Code remained applicable to the non-agricultural assessment. The revised assessment was also held to stay within the statutory ceiling in section 116, because the limit is measured against the amount payable immediately before the relevant revision and the later increase remained within twice that amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2016 12:44:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (2) TMI 330 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185088</link>
      <description>An undefined expression in the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code was construed by reference to the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904: &quot;City of Bombay&quot; was limited to the area within the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court before the 1945 extension, and was distinct from &quot;Greater Bombay.&quot; On that construction, village Andheri did not fall within the &quot;City of Bombay,&quot; so the Code remained applicable to the non-agricultural assessment. The revised assessment was also held to stay within the statutory ceiling in section 116, because the limit is measured against the amount payable immediately before the relevant revision and the later increase remained within twice that amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>