<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 191 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4335</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed against the order-in-appeal that set aside the penalty imposed on the respondent for non-payment of Service Tax liability for C&amp;amp;F agent services. The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) extended immunity under the Extraordinary Taxpayer Friendly Scheme to the appellant, who had registered and paid the service tax along with interest before the scheme&#039;s expiry. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision based on legal precedents, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal. Compliance with tax liabilities and adherence to registration and payment requirements within stipulated timelines are emphasized in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 191 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4335</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed against the order-in-appeal that set aside the penalty imposed on the respondent for non-payment of Service Tax liability for C&amp;amp;F agent services. The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) extended immunity under the Extraordinary Taxpayer Friendly Scheme to the appellant, who had registered and paid the service tax along with interest before the scheme&#039;s expiry. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision based on legal precedents, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal. Compliance with tax liabilities and adherence to registration and payment requirements within stipulated timelines are emphasized in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>