<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1925 (1) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185076</link>
    <description>Where the Income-tax Officer proposes to assess a return as incorrect or incomplete, service of notice under section 23(2) is treated as mandatory because it gives the assessee the statutory opportunity to produce evidence in support of the return. Prior informal examination of accounts, even where the assessee&#039;s servants were present and no further evidence was requested, does not amount to compliance with that requirement or to waiver of notice. The absence of the notice was held to prejudice the assessee and invalidate the assessment, so the reference was answered in favour of the assessee and the matter remitted for fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 1925 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:18:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1925 (1) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185076</link>
      <description>Where the Income-tax Officer proposes to assess a return as incorrect or incomplete, service of notice under section 23(2) is treated as mandatory because it gives the assessee the statutory opportunity to produce evidence in support of the return. Prior informal examination of accounts, even where the assessee&#039;s servants were present and no further evidence was requested, does not amount to compliance with that requirement or to waiver of notice. The absence of the notice was held to prejudice the assessee and invalidate the assessment, so the reference was answered in favour of the assessee and the matter remitted for fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 1925 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>