<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1471 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185070</link>
    <description>The department appealed against the disallowance of credit for service tax paid by the respondent manufacturer using TR-6 challans. The Tribunal held that TR-6 challans could be considered valid documents for claiming credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, as the recipient acted as both the payer and recipient of service tax. The appeal lacked merit and was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 17:18:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1471 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185070</link>
      <description>The department appealed against the disallowance of credit for service tax paid by the respondent manufacturer using TR-6 challans. The Tribunal held that TR-6 challans could be considered valid documents for claiming credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, as the recipient acted as both the payer and recipient of service tax. The appeal lacked merit and was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>