<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1185 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330587</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the disallowance of remuneration to partners, the addition on account of profit element in sales returns, and the restriction of disallowance of transportation expenses. Regarding the unexplained investment in construction, the Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter back to the AO for recomputation. The overall appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1185 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330587</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the disallowance of remuneration to partners, the addition on account of profit element in sales returns, and the restriction of disallowance of transportation expenses. Regarding the unexplained investment in construction, the Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter back to the AO for recomputation. The overall appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>