<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1180 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330582</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. The Tribunal upheld the principle of consistency and proper application of accounting standards. It found no suppression of sales or disallowance of commission expenses. The Tribunal also allowed the assessee&#039;s claims regarding depreciation rates and incidental expenses, affirming the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 13:15:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1180 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330582</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. The Tribunal upheld the principle of consistency and proper application of accounting standards. It found no suppression of sales or disallowance of commission expenses. The Tribunal also allowed the assessee&#039;s claims regarding depreciation rates and incidental expenses, affirming the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>