<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330580</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition related to the disallowance of interest on borrowings, as the borrowings were found to be for business purposes. The issues concerning the addition on account of rent and stamp duty/registration charges were remanded to the AO for further examination, allowing the assessee to present evidence to support their claims. The order was pronounced on 27th April 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 13:15:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330580</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition related to the disallowance of interest on borrowings, as the borrowings were found to be for business purposes. The issues concerning the addition on account of rent and stamp duty/registration charges were remanded to the AO for further examination, allowing the assessee to present evidence to support their claims. The order was pronounced on 27th April 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>