<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1177 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330579</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Appellant regarding the validity of Cenvat Credits. The penalties imposed by the Adjudicating Authority were waived for the portion of disallowed credit related to service tax, as the Tribunal found merit in the Appellant&#039;s bonafide belief. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the validity of a specific credit amount contested by the Revenue, based on detailed contract information. Penalties imposed for telephonic services and branch office payments were set aside due to conflicting case laws. Ultimately, the Appellant succeeded in establishing the admissibility of the Cenvat Credits, resulting in the penalties and disallowances being overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1177 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330579</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Appellant regarding the validity of Cenvat Credits. The penalties imposed by the Adjudicating Authority were waived for the portion of disallowed credit related to service tax, as the Tribunal found merit in the Appellant&#039;s bonafide belief. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the validity of a specific credit amount contested by the Revenue, based on detailed contract information. Penalties imposed for telephonic services and branch office payments were set aside due to conflicting case laws. Ultimately, the Appellant succeeded in establishing the admissibility of the Cenvat Credits, resulting in the penalties and disallowances being overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>