<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1173 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330575</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order confirming the demand of rebate and dismissed both appeals filed by M/s Golden Impex and another party. The decision was based on the established fraud in the rebate claim and the legal sustainability of the Show Cause Notice issued within the extended period of five years. The Tribunal found the rebate claim to be fraudulent based on forged documents, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:41:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1173 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330575</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order confirming the demand of rebate and dismissed both appeals filed by M/s Golden Impex and another party. The decision was based on the established fraud in the rebate claim and the legal sustainability of the Show Cause Notice issued within the extended period of five years. The Tribunal found the rebate claim to be fraudulent based on forged documents, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>