<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1172 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330574</link>
    <description>Unaccounted physical stock, when read with clearance figures, showed that the SSI exemption threshold under Notification No. 8/03-CE was crossed and registration was required. In the absence of registration, the stock was treated as liable to confiscation as goods meant for clandestine removal, and that confiscation was sustained. However, the redemption fine and penalty were found excessive on the facts and were reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:41:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1172 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330574</link>
      <description>Unaccounted physical stock, when read with clearance figures, showed that the SSI exemption threshold under Notification No. 8/03-CE was crossed and registration was required. In the absence of registration, the stock was treated as liable to confiscation as goods meant for clandestine removal, and that confiscation was sustained. However, the redemption fine and penalty were found excessive on the facts and were reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>