https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330565 The court directed the 2nd respondent to release seized gold chains for re-export after the Department failed to obtain a stay order within the specified period. The petitioner's writ petition seeking enforcement of the redemption order was granted, allowing re-export upon payment of fines. The court clarified that the release was solely for re-export purposes, not clearance, effectively resolving the non-implementation issue. The Revisional Authority's inability to adjudicate over the order due to its cadre as the Commissioner (Appeals) further reinforced the directive for the 2nd respondent to comply with the 1st respondent's order. en-us Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330565 The court directed the 2nd respondent to release seized gold chains for re-export after the Department failed to obtain a stay order within the specified period. The petitioner's writ petition seeking enforcement of the redemption order was granted, allowing re-export upon payment of fines. The court clarified that the release was solely for re-export purposes, not clearance, effectively resolving the non-implementation issue. The Revisional Authority's inability to adjudicate over the order due to its cadre as the Commissioner (Appeals) further reinforced the directive for the 2nd respondent to comply with the 1st respondent's order. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330565