<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 148 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4317</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the setting aside of the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, as the respondents had a reasonable cause for non-compliance. However, the Tribunal held that the penalty of Rs. 500 under Section 75A for failure to apply for registration was justified. The judgment clarified the distinct criteria for penalties under these sections, emphasizing the requirement of reasonable cause for non-compliance and the specific circumstances warranting penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 148 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4317</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the setting aside of the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, as the respondents had a reasonable cause for non-compliance. However, the Tribunal held that the penalty of Rs. 500 under Section 75A for failure to apply for registration was justified. The judgment clarified the distinct criteria for penalties under these sections, emphasizing the requirement of reasonable cause for non-compliance and the specific circumstances warranting penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>