<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1152 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330554</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim amounting to Rs. 11,18,403/- filed under Notification No. 41/2007-ST, citing inapplicability of the exemption notification to exports made under drawback claims. The tribunal affirmed that only service tax on agency charges was admissible under specified services, dismissing the appeal based on legal interpretations and precedents regarding refunds for services used as input for export goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1152 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330554</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim amounting to Rs. 11,18,403/- filed under Notification No. 41/2007-ST, citing inapplicability of the exemption notification to exports made under drawback claims. The tribunal affirmed that only service tax on agency charges was admissible under specified services, dismissing the appeal based on legal interpretations and precedents regarding refunds for services used as input for export goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>