<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 677 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185046</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and affirming the legitimacy of the transaction involving the purchase of gas cylinders. Despite minor discrepancies, the Court emphasized the importance of substantial evidence and documentation, concluding that the Tribunal&#039;s view was not perverse. The acceptance of lease rentals for subsequent years further supported the transaction&#039;s legitimacy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:09:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 677 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185046</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and affirming the legitimacy of the transaction involving the purchase of gas cylinders. Despite minor discrepancies, the Court emphasized the importance of substantial evidence and documentation, concluding that the Tribunal&#039;s view was not perverse. The acceptance of lease rentals for subsequent years further supported the transaction&#039;s legitimacy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>