<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Commissioner (Appeals) Oversteps Bounds; Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Revenue Cross Appeal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30525</link>
    <description>There was no cross appeal filed by the Revenue before the Commissioner (Appeals). In such a scenario, we agree with the ld. Advocate that the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) had travelled beyond the scope of the appeal before him and is required to be set aside on the said ground itself. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:53:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:53:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Commissioner (Appeals) Oversteps Bounds; Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Revenue Cross Appeal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30525</link>
      <description>There was no cross appeal filed by the Revenue before the Commissioner (Appeals). In such a scenario, we agree with the ld. Advocate that the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) had travelled beyond the scope of the appeal before him and is required to be set aside on the said ground itself. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:53:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>