https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330544 The appeal challenged the denial of CENVAT credit on certain services by the Assistant Commissioner. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing aircraft/helicopter parts, argued that rent-a-cab services and employee training expenses qualified as input services under CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The Judicial Member ruled in favor of the appellant, citing legal precedents and holding that the denial of credit on these services was legally unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal with any necessary consequential relief. en-us Mon, 16 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330544 The appeal challenged the denial of CENVAT credit on certain services by the Assistant Commissioner. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing aircraft/helicopter parts, argued that rent-a-cab services and employee training expenses qualified as input services under CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The Judicial Member ruled in favor of the appellant, citing legal precedents and holding that the denial of credit on these services was legally unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal with any necessary consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 16 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330544