<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 586 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185043</link>
    <description>Penalty proceedings require the assessing authority to record its own satisfaction before initiation. As the assessment order did not record that foundational satisfaction, no substantial question of law arose under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as not maintainable on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:33:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 586 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185043</link>
      <description>Penalty proceedings require the assessing authority to record its own satisfaction before initiation. As the assessment order did not record that foundational satisfaction, no substantial question of law arose under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as not maintainable on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>