<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1133 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330535</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) regarding the allocation of value for capital gains and the deletion of quantum addition, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering market values and legal precedents in determining tax liabilities and penalties under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:23:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1133 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330535</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) regarding the allocation of value for capital gains and the deletion of quantum addition, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering market values and legal precedents in determining tax liabilities and penalties under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>