<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 917 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185039</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s order for the assessment year 1995-96. The appeal was withdrawn by the Revenue due to the tax effect being below the prescribed limit of Rs. 10 Lakhs for filing appeals before the ITAT. The ITAT, comprising Shri Sanjay Garg and Shri Ashwani Taneja, pronounced the dismissal on 15th February 2016, as the appeal was not contested on its merits but solely based on the revised monetary limits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:22:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 917 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185039</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s order for the assessment year 1995-96. The appeal was withdrawn by the Revenue due to the tax effect being below the prescribed limit of Rs. 10 Lakhs for filing appeals before the ITAT. The ITAT, comprising Shri Sanjay Garg and Shri Ashwani Taneja, pronounced the dismissal on 15th February 2016, as the appeal was not contested on its merits but solely based on the revised monetary limits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>