<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 918 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185040</link>
    <description>Revenue appeal withdrawn under CBDT circular No. 21/2015 because the tax effect fell within the prescribed threshold, and the High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn with liberty to revive if required. The withdrawal was expressly not treated as an affirmation of the Tribunal&#039;s order on merits, and the substantive legal issue was left open for adjudication in an appropriate future case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:22:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 918 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185040</link>
      <description>Revenue appeal withdrawn under CBDT circular No. 21/2015 because the tax effect fell within the prescribed threshold, and the High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn with liberty to revive if required. The withdrawal was expressly not treated as an affirmation of the Tribunal&#039;s order on merits, and the substantive legal issue was left open for adjudication in an appropriate future case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>