<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>works contract</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110697</link>
    <description>The central operative position is that taxable value in a works contract is often treated by applying a service component proportion to the total contract price (commonly 40%), with reverse charge application so part of the tax is payable by the service receiver; valuation should be examined under statutory valuation principles and applicable reverse charge notifications, while the inclusion of receiver supplied materials remains subject to higher adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 12:52:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=436527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>works contract</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110697</link>
      <description>The central operative position is that taxable value in a works contract is often treated by applying a service component proportion to the total contract price (commonly 40%), with reverse charge application so part of the tax is payable by the service receiver; valuation should be examined under statutory valuation principles and applicable reverse charge notifications, while the inclusion of receiver supplied materials remains subject to higher adjudication.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 12:52:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>