<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 162 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4300</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that services provided by MIPL for storing export goods are part of &quot;cargo handling services&quot; and not taxable under &quot;Storage and Warehousing Services&quot;. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit and stayed the recovery of service tax and penalties, following the principle that specific exclusions in tax definitions should be respected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 162 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4300</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that services provided by MIPL for storing export goods are part of &quot;cargo handling services&quot; and not taxable under &quot;Storage and Warehousing Services&quot;. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit and stayed the recovery of service tax and penalties, following the principle that specific exclusions in tax definitions should be respected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>