<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 161 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4299</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order setting aside a penalty of Rs. 4,139. The Commissioner (Appeals) concluded that the respondent had paid the Service Tax through their Service Tax credit account and had not evaded tax due to legal ambiguity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 161 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4299</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order setting aside a penalty of Rs. 4,139. The Commissioner (Appeals) concluded that the respondent had paid the Service Tax through their Service Tax credit account and had not evaded tax due to legal ambiguity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>